Case 2602285/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Dr M B Khan v University of Lincoln — 2023
- Case reference
- 2602285/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr M B Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard in public at Nottingham on 17 and 18 August 2023, Employment Judge Clark sitting alone dealt with strike-out applications in case numbers 2602285/2021 and 2602984/2022. The claimant was Dr M B Khan and the respondent was the University of Lincoln.
The judgment records that the application to strike out the claimant's second claim, 2602984/2022, failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claims insofar as they raised allegations against Dr Turner and Dr Seppala were struck out because a fair trial was no longer possible.
The application to strike out the claims insofar as they raised allegations against Dr Anderson failed and was dismissed. The judgment states that case management orders would follow separately and does not record any substantive liability findings or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The application to strike out the claimant's second claim, 2602984/2022, failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claims insofar as they raised allegations against Dr Turner and Dr Seppala were struck out on the ground that a fair trial was no longer possible. The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The application to strike out the claims insofar as they raised allegations against Dr Anderson failed and was dismissed. The underlying allegations were not determined on their merits in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.