Case 2602307/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Vargsson v Nottingham College — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602307/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Vargsson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 9 March 2020 before Employment Judge Blackwell sitting alone. The written judgment records that the Claimant was represented by counsel and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal noted that the Claimant indicated pursuant to rule 51 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 that he wished to withdraw all of his claims. The Respondent then applied under rule 52 of the same Schedule.
The judgment states that, as a result, all of the Claimant's claims were dismissed. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the written record, and the note beneath the judgment says that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim in the extracted text. It records that the Claimant wished to withdraw all of his claims pursuant to rule 51 and that, on the Respondent's application under rule 52, all claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.