Case 2602462/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rogers v Asda Stores Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602462/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claims of age discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages, a redundancy payment, and detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment also recorded that the remaining claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract would proceed to hearing. No findings on liability or remedy were made in relation to those remaining claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the detriment claim arising from making a protected disclosure was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.