Case 2602627/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robert Zietkowski v Asda Stores Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602627/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Members
- Panel members
- Ms K Srivastava, Ms R Wills
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robert Zietkowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed the complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. The written judgment records only the outcomes; reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint was discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 and that it was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.