Case 2602745/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v XPO Transport Solutions UK Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602745/2023
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton In
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leicester Employment Tribunal on 14 August 2024, Employment Judge Broughton heard the claimant in person, assisted by his partner Ms Barlow. The respondent was represented by Mr Z Malik, solicitor.
The hearing was an open preliminary hearing and was described as a relief from sanction hearing under rule 38(2). The claimant asked the tribunal to set aside the dismissal of his claim for non-compliance with an Unless Order dated 22 March 2024, made by Employment Judge Welch. That application was refused for reasons given orally at the hearing.
The written judgment records that all complaints in the claim remain dismissed. The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, and it does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant applied under rule 38(2) to have the dismissal of the claim for non-compliance with an Unless Order dated 22 March 2024 set aside. The application was refused, and all complaints remained dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.