Case 2602764/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gerald Clapham v Amberon Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602764/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Members
- Panel members
- Ms F French, Ms L Lowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gerald Clapham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing at Nottingham on 20 to 23 and 28 to 29 May 2024, the Tribunal unanimously dismissed the Claimant's complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment based on the protected characteristic of race, direct age discrimination, victimisation and constructive unfair dismissal.
The written judgment states that the Respondent's application for costs was allowed. The Tribunal ordered the Claimant to pay the Respondent £6,000 as a contribution to costs, stating that the order was made because of the Claimant's unreasonable conduct and because the complaints had no reasonable prospects of success.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's unanimous disposal of the case. The short written record does not set out separate reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's unanimous disposal of the case. The short written record does not set out separate reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's unanimous disposal of the case. The short written record does not set out separate reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's unanimous disposal of the case. The short written record does not set out separate reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's unanimous disposal of the case. The short written record does not set out separate reasoning for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.