Case 2602772/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jayne Hannah v Health Education England — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602772/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jayne Hannah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment dealt only with two complaints in case number 2602772/2019. The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages under ss 13, 23, 24 and 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because the Claimant withdrew it, and the tribunal recorded that it duplicated the claim in case number 3319347/2019.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint under ss 10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 concerning failure to comply with the right to be accompanied at a grievance, again following withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment states that the Claimant's remaining claim(s) were to proceed to hearing on 2-5, 9-11 and 12 & 16 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant; the tribunal noted this complaint was a duplicate of the claim in case number 3319347/2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under ss 10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 concerning failure to comply with the right to be accompanied to a grievance; dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.