Case 2602880/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Cranfield v Salus Care Group Leicestershire Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602880/2021
- Decision date
- 7 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Cranfield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 17 November 2021. The tribunal recorded that neither respondent presented a valid response in time, so it made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
On the merits, the tribunal found that both Salus Care Group Leicestershire Ltd and Best of Homecare Ltd were liable for an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondents to pay Mr A Cranfield the gross sum of £2,200.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 11 March 2022 was cancelled because judgment was entered on the papers.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21 after both respondents failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal held both respondents liable for an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,200. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.