Case 2602882/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Alexis v Santander UK plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602882/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Ms J Hallam, Mr D Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Alexis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the complaints at issues 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.4 and 2.1.5 under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a), finding that those complaints had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal dismissed the complaints at issues 2.1.2 and 2.1.6 because they were not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time.
The tribunal also dismissed the remaining complaints at issue 2.1.7. It found that the direct race discrimination complaint was not well-founded and that the harassment related to race complaint was not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment identifies complaints at issues 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.4 and 2.1.5 as struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success, but the extracted judgment does not state the underlying legal classification of those issue numbers. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment identifies complaints at issues 2.1.2 and 2.1.6 as dismissed because they were not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time, but the extracted judgment does not state the underlying legal classification of those issue numbers. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The remaining complaint of direct race discrimination at issue 2.1.7 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The remaining complaint of harassment related to race at issue 2.1.7 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
- just and equitable to extend the time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.