Case 2602893/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Trapps v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602893/2021
- Decision date
- 28 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Trapps
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment following an earlier liability finding that Mrs L Trapps had been constructively dismissed by United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust. The tribunal heard the remedy issue in Nottingham on 28 September 2022 before Employment Judge Fredericks.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £8,895.00 and a compensatory award of £12,135.13, making a total award of £21,030.13. The compensatory award was made up of £9,972.30 for 39 weeks' net pay as past loss, £1,662.82 for lost pension contributions for the same period, and £500.00 for lost statutory rights. The tribunal stated that 39 weeks was the period before which it found the claimant would have found employment if she had properly mitigated her losses.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Remedy judgment only. Liability had already been found in the claimant's favour on constructive dismissal. | Upheld | — | £21,030 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,030
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,895
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,135
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.