Case 2603149/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr RA Khan v Consortio Security Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2603149/2020
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Judgment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr RA Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr RA Khan's complaints of racial discrimination, arrears of pay and other payments against Consortio Security Limited were dismissed by consent following withdrawal under rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. No merits findings were made.
The written judgment does not identify any monetary award, compensation breakdown, or further factual findings. It is limited to the dismissal of the withdrawn complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of racial discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by consent under rule 52. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of arrears of pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by consent under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to "other payments" but does not identify the legal basis; that complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by consent under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.