Case 2603170/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L White v OCS Group UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603170/2019
- Decision date
- 21 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the claim. Employment Judge Hutchinson therefore dismissed the proceedings under the withdrawal judgment.
The judgment does not set out findings on the underlying factual issues, liability, or remedy. No monetary award or remedy was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories identify unfair dismissal, but the short judgment does not separately adjudicate claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories identify breach of contract, but the short judgment does not separately adjudicate claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories identify unlawful deduction from wages, but the short judgment does not separately adjudicate claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories identify Working Time Regulations, but the short judgment does not separately adjudicate claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.