Case 2603742/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Dean v WM Morrison Supermarket plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603742/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Dean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 April 2020, Employment Judge Swann issued a rule 52 judgment stating that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim against Wm Morrison Supermarket Plc.
The extracted text contains no findings on liability, no discussion of the merits, and no monetary award. In the supplied case context, the listing categories are sex discrimination and unfair dismissal, but the judgment text itself does not separate or determine those heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify the heads of claim separately; classification follows the supplied case context, which lists sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. The judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not identify the heads of claim separately; classification follows the supplied case context, which lists sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. The judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.