Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, WM Morrison Supermarket plc has appeared as a respondent in 8 employment tribunal cases, with £322 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Unfair dismissal | 3 | |
| 02 | Unlawful deduction from wages | 3 | |
| 03 | Breach of contract | 2 | |
| 04 | Disability discrimination | 2 | |
| 05 | Religion or belief discrimination | 1 | |
| 06 | Part-time worker regulations | 1 | |
| 07 | Age discrimination | 1 | |
| 08 | Sex discrimination | 1 | |
| 09 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1803672/2022 | 23 March 2023 | England & Wales | Mr R Reah | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Working time regulations | £322 |
| 1803763/2021 | 21 October 2022 | England & Wales | Mr C Walker | Age discrimination | — |
| 2603742/2019 | 30 April 2020 | England & Wales | Miss S Dean | Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 1805236/2019 | 3 April 2020 | England & Wales | Mr G Ramsden | Part-time worker regulations, Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
| 2500031/2020 | 23 March 2020 | England & Wales | Mrs H Ayupala | Disability discrimination | — |
| 2600028/2020 | 23 March 2020 | England & Wales | Mr N Blow | Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
| 1300435/2019 | 19 February 2020 | England & Wales | Ms M Archer | Breach of contract, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 2302642/2019 | 30 October 2019 | England & Wales | Mr L Vandenbosch | Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.