Case 2604170/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Parmar and others v SPS Technologies Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604170/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Parmar and others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing by cloud video platform on 13 May 2021, Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone heard submissions from counsel on the claimants' application to amend and the respondent's opposition. The tribunal dismissed the amendment application.
The judge then struck out the whole of the claimants' claims under rule 37(1)(a) on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record does not set out substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims, and it records that all future hearings were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written reasons do not separate this claim from the other proceedings; the tribunal ordered that the whole of the claimants' claims be struck out under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The written reasons do not separate this claim from the other proceedings; the tribunal ordered that the whole of the claimants' claims be struck out under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.