Case 2604456/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Neale v Berry Recruitment Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2604456/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Neale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 April 2021 before Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone, the parties informed the Tribunal that they had reached agreement to settle all of the remaining claims in the case, subject only to formal conciliation by ACAS. The claimant also agreed that, once ACAS conciliation had taken place, she would withdraw her claims and agree to their dismissal.
The Tribunal did not determine any substantive liability issues. Instead, with the parties' consent, it made an order adjourning the case for 28 days from the date the order was sent to the parties. It also cancelled any future hearing listed in the matter.
The order provided that if neither party applied for the case to be relisted within that 28-day period, all remaining claims would be dismissed without further order on the basis that the claimant had withdrawn them. The written record notes that reasons were given orally and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The order records that the parties told the Tribunal they had agreed terms of settlement of all remaining claims, subject only to formal conciliation by ACAS, and that the claimant would withdraw her claims and agree to their dismissal. The Tribunal then adjourned the case and provided that, if neither party applied to relist it within 28 days, the remaining claims would be dismissed without further order on the basis that the claimant had withdrawn them. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.