Case 3200014/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L E Katte v Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200014/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Prichard Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L E Katte
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 1 August 2019, Employment Judge Prichard accepted that the claimant's nerve palsy, arising from an April 2015 road traffic accident, fell within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The respondent had already accepted that position by letter dated 13 June 2019. The claimant's original maternity, sexual orientation, age and sex discrimination claims had been withdrawn, leaving the disability-related allegations, a holiday pay claim, and issues about the reference and adjustments.
The judge said the 52-page detailed grounds were difficult to read and overloaded with legal references, and that the case as then pleaded was untriable. He stated that he was on the point of striking the claims out under rule 37(1)(a) and, unusually, rule 37(1)(e), but after the claimant asked for a second opinion he adjourned the preliminary hearing to 23 October 2019 and recused himself from future hearings. He also said the holiday pay complaint had no reasonable prospect of success in light of O'Hanlon v Commissioners of Revenue & Customs, and that he could not see a nexus between the reference complaint and the agreed disability.
On costs, the tribunal made an order under rule 76(1)(c) and rule 84 requiring the claimant to pay GBP 850 for the adjournment, noting that neither the claimant nor her representative said they had difficulty meeting that amount and referring to the claimant's Band 8A salary of nearly GBP 55,000. No substantive compensation or injury to feelings award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 76(1)(c) adjournment costs order. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay the respondent's costs of the adjournment in the sum of GBP 850; the substantive disability and holiday pay claims were not determined on the merits in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £850 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that this claim was withdrawn and was no longer pursued. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records that this claim was withdrawn and was no longer pursued. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that this claim was withdrawn and was no longer pursued. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that this claim was withdrawn and was no longer pursued. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £850
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37(1)(e) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- O'Hanlon v Commissioners of Revenue & Customs [2007] CA Civ 283
- Rule 76(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 84 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.