Case 3200045/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Leanne Mifsud v Circle Health Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200045/2024
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Members
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs G McLaughlin, Mr J Quinlan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leanne Mifsud
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London East Hearing Centre from 18 to 21 February 2025 before Employment Judge S Knight with Mrs G McLaughlin and Mr J Quinlan, found that Leanne Mifsud's complaints against Circle Health Group Limited of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments were well-founded and succeeded. The tribunal also found that her complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that she was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaint that the Respondent had failed to pay a redundancy payment, finding it not well-founded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a total of £54,897.56, comprising a basic award for unfair dismissal of £3,715.97, compensation for loss of earnings arising from the failure to make reasonable adjustments of £3,226.20, compensation for loss of earnings arising from discrimination arising from disability resulting in dismissal of £22,955.39, £15,000 for injury to feelings, and £10,000 for personal injury.
For the purposes of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996, the tribunal recorded that the total monetary award for unfair dismissal was £3,715.97, the prescribed element was £0, and the prescribed element related to the period from 17 October 2023 to 24 February 2025. The judgment text supplied is the judgment summary only and does not set out the tribunal's reasoning or the legal tests it applied.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (s.15 EqA) well-founded and succeeds. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability well-founded and succeeds. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded; Claimant was unfairly dismissed. Basic award of £3,715.97 attached to this claim. | Upheld | — | £3,716 |
| Redundancy | Complaint that Respondent failed to pay a redundancy payment not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £54,898
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,716
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £26,182
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.