Case 3200155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Ayalogu v The Co-Operative Group Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200155/2022
- Decision date
- 24 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Ayalogu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, 20 October 2021 to 4 November 2021, due to a right shoulder impairment.
The claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims of direct disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not finally determined in this judgment and were listed to proceed to a further hearing on 22, 23 and 24 November 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim is dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not finally determined; the judgment states it will proceed to hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was not finally determined; the judgment states it will proceed to hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.