Case 3200180/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Masarrat Rasool v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3200180/2025
- Decision date
- 22 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittall Representation
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Masarrat Rasool
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 August 2025, in a rule 60 no-hearing judgment, Employment Judge Whittall recorded that Dr Masarrat Rasool's claims of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal against all respondents. The judgment also disposed of any other claims referenced in the claimant's two ET1s, apart from direct sex and race/religion discrimination, in the same way.
The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary remedy. The direct sex and race/religion discrimination claims were expressly excepted from the dismissal wording, so this judgment does not determine them.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal against all respondents. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal against all respondents. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also dismisses upon withdrawal any other claim referenced in the two ET1s apart from direct sex and race/religion discrimination; the specific claim type is not identified. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.