Case 3200199/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Gauntlett v One Housing Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200199/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Gauntlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Gauntlett brought claims against One Housing Group Limited for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages and unpaid annual leave. The tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Russell, heard the case at East London Hearing Centre on 25, 26 and 27 February 2020.
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal complaint. It did not set out separate factual findings in the extracted text, but the judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded.
The judgment also records that the disability discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages, and unpaid annual leave complaints were not pursued and were dismissed. The parties agreed the remedy, but no monetary terms are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment says the complaint was not pursued and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to an unauthorised deduction from wages complaint and says it was not pursued and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid annual leave and says that complaint was not pursued and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.