Case 3200242/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MH Touray v SSGC Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200242/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MH Touray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr MH Touray appeared in person against SSGC Limited, represented by its director, before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre on 15 August 2019. The judgment, dated 9 September 2019, records that the claimant succeeded in his claims for non-payment of the shortfall of wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal awarded £100 for reinstatement of the accommodation subsidy that had been deducted from wages on 10 June 2018 and £858.75 for the shortfall in wages for work at the Nestle Sudbury site. It also awarded £729.83 for unpaid holiday pay in accordance with the respondent's computation. The judgment notes that the figures were calculated gross and may be subject to deductions for tax and national insurance, making the total award £1,688.58.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant succeeded on the non-payment of the shortfall of wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996. This award included £100 for reinstatement of the accommodation subsidy deducted on 10 June 2018 and £858.75 for the wage shortfall at the Nestle Sudbury site. | Upheld | — | £959 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay was awarded at £729.83, stated to be in accordance with the respondent's computation. | Upheld | — | £730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,689
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.