Case 3200380/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Femi-Ola v 24x7 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200380/2020
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Femi-Ola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Femi-Ola, brought claims against 24x7 Limited. The respondent did not attend and no response was presented. Employment Judge Russell heard the matter at the East London Hearing Centre on 9 July 2020 and gave judgment on 10 July 2020.
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and the tribunal awarded a basic award of £951.90, compensation of £2,475, and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, awarding £2,750 for unpaid wages calculated at £275 per month for 10 months. A further claim for accrued holiday outstanding on termination succeeded, with an award of £291.92 for 23 days' holiday. The total sum payable to the claimant was £6,968.82.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. The unfair dismissal remedy comprised a basic award of £951.90, compensation of £2,475, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £3,927 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded £2,750 for unpaid wages (10 months at £275 per month). | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for accrued holiday outstanding on termination and awarded £291.92 for 23 days' holiday. | Upheld | — | £292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,969
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £952
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,475
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.