Case 3200496/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Cepaite v OSR Recruitment Services Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200496/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms R Cepaite
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following the Claimant's withdrawal of the claim.
The claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the First and Second Respondent on 6 January 2019, and to payment of accrued holiday pay and unpaid wages prior to 7 January 2019. The Claimant settled these claims by way of COT3 and withdrew them by correspondence to the Tribunal on 16 October 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the First and Second Respondent on 6 January 2019; it was settled by COT3, then withdrawn, and the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim included payment of accrued holiday pay prior to 7 January 2019; it was settled by COT3, then withdrawn, and the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim included unpaid wages prior to 7 January 2019; it was settled by COT3, then withdrawn, and the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.