Case 3200647/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Morgan v Clarity Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200647/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Taylor decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded notice damages of £548.78. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £837.12.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £539.48 for that claim. The listed hearing on 4 October 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £549 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £837 |
| Holiday pay | Award made for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £539 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,925
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.