Case 3200648/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Brown v Clarity Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200648/2021
- Decision date
- 1 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time after the claim was issued on 8 March 2021. Regional Employment Judge Taylor decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment, and had not been paid holiday entitlement. The respondent was ordered to pay notice damages of £1,953.28, a redundancy payment of £2,929.92, and holiday pay of £348.80, making £5,232.00 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,953 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,930 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £349 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,232
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.