Case 3200660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ali v Security Industry Authority — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200660/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrowclough Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Ali's claim against the Security Industry Authority was dismissed after he failed to attend the preliminary hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 25 September 2019 without reasonable cause. The tribunal stated that the dismissal was made pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim, any liability analysis, or any monetary award. The decision is limited to procedural dismissal following the claimant's non-attendance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the Claimant's claim was dismissed because he failed to attend the preliminary hearing on 25 September 2019 without reasonable cause. The underlying substantive claim type is not stated in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.