Case 3200686/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Stupiak v OSR Recruitment Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200686/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Stupiak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the respondent’s name was amended from OSR Ltd to OSR Recruitment Services Limited. It stated that the claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the respondent and Randstad Solutions Limited on 6 January 2019, together with claims for accrued holiday pay and unpaid wages before 7 January 2019.
The judgment further recorded that Miss E Stupiak had settled those claims, and related claims against Randstad Solutions Limited, by way of a COT3. Following correspondence to the Tribunal dated 25 November 2019 withdrawing the claims, the Tribunal dismissed the proceedings. The judgment does not record any adjudication on the substantive merits of the TUPE, holiday pay, or unpaid wages issues, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment states that the claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the respondent and Randstad Solutions Limited on 6 January 2019. It also records that the claims were settled by COT3 and then withdrawn, after which the proceedings were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim included accrued holiday pay. It records that the claims were settled by COT3 and then withdrawn, after which the proceedings were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim included unpaid wages prior to 7 January 2019. It records that the claims were settled by COT3 and then withdrawn, after which the proceedings were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.