Case 3200747/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Woodroof v Trentside Geotechnical Testing and Site Investigations Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200747/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Members
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Ms A Berry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Woodroof
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 2, 3 and 27 September 2021 before Employment Judge Gardiner, sitting with lay members Mrs M Legg and Ms A Berry. The claimant was represented by Mr P Kerfoot, counsel, and the respondent by Mr G Wing, its director.
The tribunal's judgment was that the claimant's complaints of direct age discrimination, harassment related to age, and victimisation were not well founded. All of those complaints were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out separate factual findings or reasoning for each complaint in the text provided, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal held the complaint of direct age discrimination was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal held the complaint of harassment related to age was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal held the complaint of victimisation was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.