Case 3200760/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Betteridge v The Vine Residential Services (TVRS) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200760/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Lay
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr M Wood, Ms T Jansen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Betteridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Claimant had continuous employment from 27 May 2019 to 6 January 2020, but it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. It also found that the disability-related harassment claim succeeded only on issue 15(g), while the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed.
The tribunal awarded compensation of £426.92 for one week’s net pay as loss of earnings and £3,000 for injury to feelings. It also awarded interest of £25.29 on the loss of earnings element and £355.39 on the injury to feelings element, making a total award of £3,807.60.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
| Harassment | The disability-related harassment claim succeeded on issue 15(g) only. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,808
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,427
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.