Case 3200771/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Weedon v Purdy Contracts — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200771/2023
- Decision date
- 9 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs G Forrest, Mr P Lush
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Weedon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at East London Hearing Centre on 9 November 2023 before Employment Judge Byrne, with Mrs G Forrest and Mr P Lush as the lay members. The Claimant, Miss K Weedon, did not attend and was not represented. The Respondent appeared through Mr N Henry, Litigation Consultant.
The Tribunal recorded that the judgment was unanimous. It noted that the Claimant failed to attend or be represented, and that it had made such enquiries as were practicable before deciding how to proceed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
Having considered the information available about the reason for the Claimant's absence, the Tribunal found it appropriate to dismiss the claims before it. The claims for unfair dismissal and harassment were therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.