Case 3200810/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Cordier v Chalgrove Properties Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200810/2021
- Decision date
- 3 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Cordier
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 November 2021, Employment Judge A.M.S. Green heard applications under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The respondent's application succeeded in part: the claims of automatic unfair dismissal, indirect race discrimination and victimisation were struck out.
The respondent's application to strike out the harassment claim was dismissed. The claimant's application to strike out the response to the direct race discrimination claim and breach of contract claim was also dismissed. The judgment was procedural only and did not determine the underlying merits of the surviving claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim struck out under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination claim struck out under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim struck out under rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Harassment | Respondent's application to strike out the harassment claim was dismissed, so the claim remained live. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Claimant's application to strike out the response to the direct race discrimination claim was dismissed, so the response remained live. | Other | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's application to strike out the response to the breach of contract claim was dismissed, so the response remained live. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.