Case 3200827/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Nicholas Ndiaye v John Lewis plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3200827/2023
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sugarman Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Nicholas Ndiaye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter at the East London Hearing Centre on 31 August 2023 before Employment Judge Sugarman. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records only the outcome of the respondent's application to strike out the claims. The tribunal dismissed that application in respect of the claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination because of religion, and breach of contract. The judgment does not determine the merits of those claims or make any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the respondent's application to strike out the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. It does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the respondent's application to strike out the claim for discrimination because of religion was dismissed. It does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | Religion or belief | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent's application to strike out the breach of contract claim was dismissed. It does not determine the merits of the claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.