Case 3200885/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Venskiene v OSR Recruitment Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3200885/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Venskiene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the Respondent's name from OSR Recruitment Ltd to OSR Recruitment Services Limited. The claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the Respondent and Randstad Solutions Limited on 6 January 2019, and to payment of accrued holiday pay and unpaid wages before 7 January 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the Claimant had settled these claims, and any related claims against Randstad Solutions Limited, by way of a COT3 on 30 August 2019. The Claimant withdrew her claims by correspondence to the Tribunal on the same date. The proceedings were dismissed following that withdrawal. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment says the claim related to a possible transfer of undertakings between the Respondent and Randstad Solutions Limited on 6 January 2019; it was settled by COT3 on 30 August 2019, withdrawn, and dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to payment of accrued holiday pay prior to 7 January 2019; it was settled by COT3 on 30 August 2019, withdrawn, and dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to unpaid wages prior to 7 January 2019; it was settled by COT3 on 30 August 2019, withdrawn, and dismissed following withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.