Case 3200972/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Nadia Mahmood v Arcadia Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3200972/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Nadia Mahmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Hallen sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre by telephone on 25 January 2021. The claimant, Ms Nadia Mahmood, appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the deduction related to unpaid wages for the period 1 to 31 January 2020.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £800 net in respect of those unpaid wages. No other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant suffered unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £800 net for unpaid wages for 1 to 31 January 2020. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £800
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £800
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.