Case 3201208/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Seale v Axis Europe Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201208/2019
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Seale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Seale was dismissed with effect from 26 November 2018. She presented her tribunal claim on 26 April 2019, after the expiry of the extended primary time limit following early conciliation, which ran to 24 April 2019. The preliminary hearing therefore addressed only limitation and jurisdiction, not the merits of the dismissal or wage complaints.
For unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction of wages, the tribunal applied the section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 tests and asked whether it was reasonably practicable to present the claims in time. It found that the claimant knew she had the right to bring tribunal proceedings, had taken legal advice before the disciplinary hearing, had contacted ACAS, and had been told on 24 April 2019 that it was her responsibility to ensure the claim was submitted on time. The tribunal did not accept that her stated reasons, including waiting for insurance cover, possible settlement discussions, or ill-health, made it impracticable to present in time.
For the disability discrimination complaints, the tribunal applied section 123 Equality Act 2010 and considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time. It accepted that the claimant said she had chronic fatigue, but no medical evidence was produced to support a disability-based explanation for the delay. The tribunal relied on the claimant's lack of action after receiving repeated information about the time limit, including ACAS's warning that she risked being out of time, and held that there were insufficient grounds to extend time. All claims were dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented two days outside the extended primary time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and therefore had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented two days outside the extended primary time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and therefore had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal treated the disability discrimination complaints as out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010 and held it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.207B(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Robertson v Bexley Community Care Centre
- Deadman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- s.33 Limitation Act 1980
- reasonably practicable test
- just and equitable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.