Case 3201246/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R v T&T Consultancy London Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201246/2018
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms T Jansen, Dr J Ukemenam
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that the respondent harassed Ms R contrary to section 26(2) of the Equality Act 2010 and failed to provide her with a written statement of particulars of employment contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally in open court on 8 November 2019 and that the written record was issued later, dated 3 December 2019.
For remedy on the harassment claim, the tribunal recorded that Ms R’s employment ran from 2 October 2017 to 19 February 2018 and that she earned £953 net per month from 1 January 2018, with a gross monthly wage of £1,000. It awarded three months’ loss of wages, calculated at £2,859, together with interest of £228.72.
The tribunal also awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings on the successful harassment claim, plus interest of £1,600. Separately, for the failure to provide written terms and conditions, it awarded four weeks’ wages under section 38 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, calculated at £880. The total remedy ordered was £25,567.72.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal found the respondent harassed the claimant contrary to section 26(2) of the Equality Act 2010. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic relied on. | Upheld | — | £24,688 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal awarded 4 weeks' wages under section 38 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deduction of wages failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,568
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,739
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 26(2) Equality Act 2010
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.