Case 3201248/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Duffield v Parfums Christian Dior Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201248/2018
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs G A Everett, Mr P Quinn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Duffield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment. The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £25,033.26, made up of a basic award of £692.30, loss of statutory rights of £500, a compensatory award of £5,840.96, and £18,000 for injury to feelings. The judgment records that there would be no ACAS uplift and no award of interest, and that payment was due within 21 days.
The tribunal and the parties were of the view that section 406 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act did not apply because the dismissal occurred before 6 April 2018, the total settlement figure was below £30,000, and the injury to feelings arose from discrimination found to have occurred before termination of employment. The judgment also states that there was no finding that the termination itself was an act of discrimination causing injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment for a total settlement of £25,033.26; the extracted text records a basic award, compensatory award and loss of statutory rights, but does not split the sum by claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Included in the case listing; the extracted consent judgment does not separately address this head of claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The extracted text refers to injury to feelings caused by discrimination before termination, but does not separately allocate the discrimination claim. | Settled | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The extracted text refers to discrimination generically and does not separately allocate the discrimination claims. | Settled | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,033
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £692
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,841
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.