Case 3201302/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Fairhurst v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201302/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Land, Mr L O'Callaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Fairhurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at London East Hearing Centre on 17, 18, 19 and 20 June 2025 before Employment Judge Moor with members Ms J Land and Mr L O'Callaghan. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The unanimous judgment records that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also records that the complaints of harassment relating to disability were not well-founded and were dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time. No remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies this as a complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments and records that it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies complaints of harassment relating to disability and records that they were not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.