Case 3201305/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Anthony Abolaji v CIS Security Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201305/2022
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Anthony Abolaji
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claims of direct discrimination because of disability under sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010, and his claims that there had been failures to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not determine those claims on their merits; it records only that they were withdrawn and therefore dismissed.
The tribunal also stated that all of the Claimant’s other claims were unaffected by this judgment. No remedy, liability findings, or monetary award are recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination because of disability under ss.13 and 39 Equality Act 2010; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20, 21 and 39 Equality Act 2010; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.