Case 3201400/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Clavier v DHL Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3201400/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Clavier
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant transferred to the respondent's Basildon depot on a TUPE transfer. The tribunal found that the contractual terms applying on transfer were those in the claimant's 2017 contract, subject only to agreed increases in pay, and that his salary at transfer was £39,411. The tribunal found that the claimant was not given written proposed new terms before or at transfer, was not told during consultation that a collective agreement would apply, and was not told of implications for sick pay.
The respondent argued that the National Transport Agreement at Basildon governed the claimant's terms and entitled it to exclude London Weighting during sickness absence. The tribunal rejected that argument, finding there was no statutory provision, contractual term, or prior written consent authorising the deduction. It concluded the claimant should have been paid sick pay based on his basic salary under the 2017 contract.
For remedy, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had been underpaid by £709 per month from November 2022 to April 2023 and by £354.50 per month from May to December 2023 after the contractual move to half pay. It awarded £7,056 gross for the unauthorised deductions, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the complaint as unauthorised deductions from wages and as a s.13 Employment Rights Act claim for arrears of pay. The reference in paragraph 33 to November 2012 appears inconsistent with the rest of the judgment, which identifies November 2022 as the start of the deductions. | Upheld | — | £7,056 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,056
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.