Case 3201434/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A. Pandor v Lea Interchange Bus Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201434/2023
- Decision date
- 28 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A. Pandor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at East London Hearing Centre on 26 to 28 August 2025 before Employment Judge Massarella, with representation for both parties and a Gujarati interpreter. The published judgment records two substantive claims: unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal (notice pay). Both claims failed and were dismissed.
The same judgment records that the Respondent’s application for an order for costs and/or wasted costs, made in respect of an earlier postponement of the final hearing, was refused. The published record does not set out the tribunal’s reasoning in detail because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay). | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.