Case 3201543/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Thomas v St Mungo Community Housing Association — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201543/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodrich Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing at the East London Hearing Centre on 5 December 2019, the Claimant's representative notified Employment Judge Goodrich and the Respondent's representative that the Claimant no longer pursued the elements of the claim identified in the judgment. The representative consented on the Claimant's behalf to those elements being dismissed on withdrawal.
The claims dismissed on withdrawal were described as direct disability discrimination, harassment, disability discrimination, victimisation, and direct and indirect disability discrimination. The judgment records that the Claimant continued to pursue the remainder of her claims, but it does not identify those remaining claims or determine them.
No remedy was awarded or assessed in this withdrawal judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records complaints described as direct disability discrimination, disability discrimination, and direct and indirect disability discrimination as dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The wording is duplicative, so this entry groups the disability discrimination complaints. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The harassment complaint was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not separately specify the protected characteristic for harassment, but it appears in the same list of disability discrimination complaints. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not separately specify the protected characteristic for victimisation, but it appears in the same list of disability discrimination complaints. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.