Case 3201597/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Emily Windle (2) Charlotte Hooks v Fusion Lifestyle — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201597/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Emily Windle (2) Charlotte Hooks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre on 2 December 2020 before Employment Judge S Knight, held that Fusion Lifestyle had made unauthorised deductions from both claimants' wages. The judgment records the claimants as Emily Windle and Charlotte Hooks and states that each succeeded on the wages claim.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay Emily Windle £1,207.10 gross, being the amount of the unauthorised deduction made, and ordered the Respondent to pay Charlotte Hooks £629.50 gross, being the amount of the unauthorised deduction made. No separate liability reasoning, legal test, or additional remedy is set out in the short judgment beyond those findings and awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from Emily Windle's wages and ordered payment of £1,207.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,207 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from Charlotte Hooks's wages and ordered payment of £629.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £630 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,837
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.