Case 3201780/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Hayat v University of East London — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201780/2019
- Decision date
- 18 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Hayat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Burgher struck out Miss S Hayat's complaint of unfair dismissal against ESS Primary Care Solutions & Others. The judgment records that the Tribunal had written to the claimant on 27 September 2019 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out.
The stated reason for striking out the unfair dismissal complaint was insufficient length of service. The judgment expressly recorded that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 27 November 2019; those claims were not identified or determined in this strike out judgment. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out due to insufficient length of service. The judgment records that remaining claims stayed listed for hearing on 27 November 2019, but does not identify or decide them. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.