Case 3201805/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Noor v UC Franchising Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201805/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elgot Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Noor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a default judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The respondent, UC Franchising Ltd, did not present a response within the time limit, did not appear, and was not represented. Employment Judge Elgot was satisfied on the available information that a decision could be made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as unpaid wages. It was determined by default judgment under Rule 21 after no response was presented and the respondent did not appear. | Upheld | — | £982 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £982
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.