Mr B Dieme v Elevate Staffing Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 3201875/2021
Decision date: 11 November 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Russell

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr B Dieme

Respondent

Elevate Staffing Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 5 May 2021, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make written representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, on the basis that he had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for hearing on 19 November 2021.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	By letter dated 5 May 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out because he had been employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing, so the complaint was struck out.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.