Case 3201877/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss V. Burrows v London & Quadrant Housing Trust and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 3201877/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss V. Burrows
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss V. Burrows brought claims of direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, and constructive (discriminatory) dismissal under the Equality Act 2010, together with a constructive unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the direct and indirect disability discrimination claims were withdrawn in their entirety.
The judgment also records withdrawal of the Equality Act constructive dismissal claim, referring to withdrawal against the Second Respondent and then to dismissal on withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No liability findings or remedy findings were made on those claims.
The constructive unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant did not have the necessary two-year qualifying period of employment to bring such a claim. The judgment does not record any monetary award, injury-to-feelings award, or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim withdrawn in its entirety. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect disability discrimination claim withdrawn in its entirety. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive (discriminatory) dismissal under the Equality Act 2010; the judgment records withdrawal under Rule 52, Sch.1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996 struck out because the claimant lacked the necessary two-year qualifying period of employment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52, Sch.1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- two-year qualifying period of employment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.