Case 3201918/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J C Muaka v UCLH NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201918/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr J Quinlan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J C Muaka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the East London Hearing Centre on 22, 23, 24 and 25 July 2025, Employment Judge Byrne sitting with Mr J Quinlan heard Mr J C Muaka's claims against UCLH NHS Foundation Trust. The written judgment records that the claimant's claims for direct race discrimination and for harassment related to race and disability were not upheld and were dismissed.
The extracted decision does not set out substantive written reasons. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. No monetary remedy is recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct race discrimination was not upheld and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment related to race and disability was not upheld and was dismissed; the extracted text does not separate this into distinct harassment claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.