Case 3201948/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Warren Adams v PMC Soil Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3201948/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Warren Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment. The tribunal found that PMC Soil Solutions Limited had failed to comply with its obligations under s.188 and s.188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Pursuant to s.189 of the same Act, the tribunal made a protective award in favour of each claimant for a period of 90 days commencing on 1 July 2019. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate monetary calculation or award figure, only the duration of the protective award.
The hearing listed for 16 July 2020 was cancelled. No additional findings, remedies, or panel composition are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent failed to comply with its obligations under s.188 and s.188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and a protective award was made under s.189 for a period of 90 days commencing on 1 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.